Father Rescues Daughter Who Fell Overboard from Disney Cruise Ship Near Fort Lauderdale – CBS Miami

A father made a heroic leap into the ocean to save his young daughter after she fell overboard from a Disney Cruise Line ship returning to South Florida. The dramatic incident occurred on Sunday aboard the Disney Dream while sailing between the Bahamas and Fort Lauderdale. According to passengers and videos shared on social media, the father acted immediately, jumping into the water after his daughter.

An emergency alert was sounded throughout the ship as crew members quickly launched a rescue boat and deployed life preservers. Passenger Laura Amador described the scene, noting how fast the ship moved, causing the father and daughter to quickly become small dots in the vast ocean. The captain slowed the ship and initiated a turn, enabling a rescue team to reach them.

The Disney Dream arrived at Port Everglades early Monday morning after completing a four-night cruise. The identities of the father and daughter remain undisclosed. A TikTok user captured footage of the father treading water with his daughter in his arms before handing her over to the rescue crew.

Passengers reacted with relief and admiration, cheering when the rescue was successfully completed. Many expressed their emotional responses, with one passenger, Tracy Robinson-Hughes, describing the father as a hero for his courageous act. The incident caused widespread anguish among witnesses, many of whom were grateful for the quick response of the crew.

Cruise expert Amanda Berry commended the successful rescue but noted that parents should be more vigilant in monitoring their children on cruises. She highlighted the rarity of survival in such situations, emphasizing the effectiveness of the Disney staff in this particular instance. A Disney Cruise Line spokesperson praised crew members for their prompt actions, reaffirming the company’s commitment to guest safety.

92-Year-Old Man Found Guilty of Woman’s 1967 Murder, Closing One of U.K.’s Oldest Cold Cases

A 92-year-old man was convicted on Monday of the rape and murder of a woman in southwestern England. This case marks the resolution of what is considered the U.K.’s longest-running cold case. A jury at Bristol Crown Court found Ryland Headley guilty of attacking 75-year-old Louisa Dunne in June 1967, after nearly six decades of investigation.

Prosecutor Charlotte Ream noted the horror of Dunne’s death, stating that she was attacked in her own home, a place where she should have felt safest. For 58 years, the crime went unsolved, allowing Headley to evade justice until now. Dunne’s body was discovered by a neighbor on June 28, 1967, following reports of a woman’s chilling scream that night.

An autopsy revealed that she died due to strangulation and asphyxiation, and it was determined that she had also been raped. The Crown Prosecution Service identified this case as one of the oldest cold cases ever resolved in the U.K. Investigators retained evidence from the crime scene, including Dunne’s clothing and a palm print believed to belong to Headley. Over the decades, initial police efforts failed to uncover a suspect, despite collecting thousands of fingerprint samples from local men and boys.

In 2023, the case was revisited, and forensic testing on Dunne’s skirt revealed DNA linking Headley to the crime scene. His DNA had previously been cataloged in the national database due to an unrelated incident. Following his arrest in November, details about Headley’s criminal past surfaced, including a conviction for raping two elderly women in the late 1970s.

Though most witnesses have passed away, their accounts from the original investigation were used effectively during Headley’s trial. Dunne’s granddaughter expressed her astonishment at the arrest, having previously accepted that some murders remain unsolved. Detective Inspector Dave Marchant emphasized the ongoing commitment to investigating other unsolved cases in the region.

Headley’s sentencing is scheduled for Tuesday.

20 Bodies, Some Decapitated, Discovered Amid Sinaloa Cartel Faction Violence in Mexico

Authorities in Mexico have discovered twenty bodies, several of which were decapitated, on a highway bridge in a region plagued by violence between factions of the Sinaloa cartel. The Sinaloa state prosecutor’s office reported that four headless corpses were located by the roadside, while sixteen others were found inside an abandoned vehicle. Additionally, five severed heads were discovered in a bag at the scene. All victims exhibited signs of gunshot wounds.

Local reports indicated that the four decapitated bodies may have been displayed hanging from the bridge, a notorious tactic employed by criminal gangs. However, this detail has not been officially confirmed. At the site, authorities also noted that the bodies were accompanied by a note that appears to have come from one of the cartel factions, although the specifics of the note have not been revealed. Feliciano Castro, spokesperson for the Sinaloa government, expressed outrage over the brutal killings and emphasized the need for a reassessment of the government’s approach to combating organized crime, given the escalating violence.

Castro stated that military and police forces are collaborating to restore peace in Sinaloa. Violence in the northwestern state has surged since the arrest of Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada, one of the cartel’s co-founders, nearly a year ago in the United States. This conflict has resulted in over 1,200 deaths, mostly between factions aligned with Zambada and those loyal to the infamous Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman and his sons, collectively known as the “Chapitos.” The Chapitos have been linked to gruesome methods of torture, including electrocution and the feeding of rivals to tigers, as detailed in recent U.S. Justice Department indictments.

In recent months, the appearance of bodies has become commonplace across Sinaloa, often presented in macabre ways. The ongoing criminal violence, predominantly tied to drug trafficking, has led to approximately 480,000 deaths in Mexico since 2006, with over 120,000 individuals reported missing.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Skeptical About Quick Resumption of U.S. Talks, Yet Diplomacy Remains Open

Iran’s foreign minister expressed skepticism regarding the prompt resumption of diplomatic talks with the United States, despite President Trump indicating that negotiations could restart soon. The White House has clarified that no discussions are currently scheduled.

Following U.S. airstrikes targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities, a ceasefire was declared to conclude what President Trump referred to as a 12-day conflict with Israel. In a recent interview with an American news outlet, Foreign Minister Araghchi conveyed that returning to diplomacy would require assurances that the U.S. would not engage in military actions during negotiations.

He emphasized the need for more time to address these concerns. Nevertheless, Araghchi conveyed that “the doors of diplomacy will never slam shut,” indicating a potential openness to future discussions.

He noted the recent U.S. airstrikes had damaged significant nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordo and Natanz. Araghchi countered Trump’s claims that these sites had been “obliterated,” asserting that technology and knowledge for uranium enrichment cannot be eradicated through bombing.

He stated that Iran could swiftly recover from the damages if it chose to prioritize its nuclear program. In response to inquiries about Iran’s intentions regarding uranium enrichment, Araghchi characterized the country’s nuclear aspirations as a source of national pride, particularly in light of the recent conflict with Israel.

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei publicly claimed victory over Israel, acknowledging Iran’s resilience during the 12-day war. In response, President Trump dismissed Khamenei’s assertions and reiterated a hard stance against Iranian nuclear activities, suggesting potential military action if Iran escalates uranium enrichment levels.

As tensions persist, both Mr. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are scheduled to convene at the White House next week, setting the stage for further discussions about Iran’s nuclear program and regional stability.

North Carolina Family Fears Medicaid Cuts Will Force Treatment Rationing for Their 6-Year-Old Child

Kennedy Beaver, a 6-year-old from North Carolina, has been undergoing therapy sessions at least twice a week since her diagnosis with Noonan syndrome, a genetic condition that hampers her development. She is one of 600,000 individuals in the state who stand to lose access to essential healthcare services as Congress prepares to endorse significant cuts to Medicaid funding proposed in President Trump’s latest legislative agenda.

The Community Alternatives Program for Children (CAP/C) in North Carolina plays a crucial role in covering most treatments and medications for children under 20 with serious medical needs. The Beaver family has highlighted that without this program, they would face monthly expenses exceeding $4,000 for Kennedy’s care, even with private insurance.

“Without Medicaid coverage, our medication would cost $3,200 a month since our primary insurance denied us,” Marilyn stated, expressing their concerns over potentially having to ration Kennedy’s treatment if the proposed cuts are enacted. Jay Ludlam, Deputy Secretary of North Carolina Medicaid, emphasized that these suggested cuts at the federal level will inevitably impact the entire Medicaid program.

The state’s Medicaid framework currently offers benefits to over 3 million residents, and officials warn that reductions in federal funding could jeopardize programs like CAP/C. Ludlam remarked on the broad implications of a $700 billion cut to Medicaid nationwide, stressing that such drastic reductions would most likely lead to coverage loss and alterations to the benefits people receive.

If given the chance to address lawmakers directly, Marilyn expressed her desire for them to pursue health system reforms that improve access without compromising services. “It’s about fixing the healthcare system so that everyone in the country receives adequate care,” she concluded.

Trump’s Deployment of National Guard to L.A. May Shift Back to California Wildfire Response

General Gregory Guillot, the commander of U.S. Northern Command, has requested Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to return 200 out of approximately 4,000 California National Guard members to address wildfire duties. This proposal, aimed at preparing for the upcoming wildfire season, seeks to place the Guard members on standby to respond to potential fire outbreaks.

While wildfires can occur year-round in California, they are particularly prevalent during the summer and fall months. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection has indicated that this year may see an “early and active” wildfire season, with heightened activity expected in July and August.

The objective of this redeployment is to ensure readiness and support for firefighting efforts in the state. The deployment of National Guard forces to Los Angeles has been a contentious issue, facing legal challenges from California Governor Gavin Newsom.

In response to protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement, President Trump deployed around 4,000 Guard members, along with roughly 700 Marines, despite Governor Newsom’s objections. Newsom argued that the deployment was both illegal and unnecessary, diverting resources from critical wildfire response efforts.

When the deployment was initiated, the state expressed concerns that it would hinder its ability to combat wildfires, as Guard members typically collaborate with Cal Fire. Reports have indicated that due to the Los Angeles deployment, the National Guard’s firefighting capability was operating at only 40% capacity.

Amidst these developments, a federal court initially ruled in favor of the state, but a higher court later reversed that decision, permitting the Trump administration to maintain control of the Guard. The legal battle continues, focusing on the authority exercised by the President to federalize National Guard forces without the governor’s consent.

New Tax Break for Tipped Workers? What You Need to Know About the Proposed “Big, Beautiful Bill

President Trump’s initiative to eliminate taxes on worker tips may soon materialize, as senators finalize a substantial budget package dubbed the “big, beautiful bill.” A primary element of this legislation aims to alleviate federal income tax burdens for workers dependent on tips, including waiters, bartenders, and hairdressers. While the White House promotes this move as a success for the working class, critics like the Independent Restaurant Coalition argue that the benefits might be short-lived and that many low-wage workers might not see real assistance.

The proposed “no tax on tips” provision would create a new deduction for tipped workers, removing their federal tax obligations on tips earned. However, these workers would still need to pay state and local income taxes, as well as payroll taxes. Notably, the House and Senate versions of the bill diverge on key aspects, particularly regarding deduction limits.

The Senate’s proposal caps the deduction at $25,000, while the House version allows for no cap. Moreover, the House limits eligibility for the tax break to individuals earning $160,000 or less annually, while the Senate suggests phasing out benefits for those making over $150,000 and couples exceeding $300,000. According to estimates from the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers, abolishing taxes on tips could increase the average take-home pay of eligible workers by approximately $1,675 yearly.

A survey revealed that 83% of hourly workers favor eliminating taxes on tips, indicating that added income could provide essential support for many workers. However, data shows that a significant number of tipped workers may not benefit, as over one-third already fall below taxable income levels. Critics emphasize that the tax break would primarily assist higher earners while leaving many low-wage employees, especially in fast food, without support.

Advocates suggest raising the federal minimum wage as a more effective strategy to help low-wage workers, addressing the root cause of income insufficiency rather than focusing solely on tax deductions.

Minimum Wage Increases Coming in July for 15 Cities and States – Full List Here.

In July, hundreds of thousands of workers in various cities and states will experience wage increases as minimum wage hikes take effect. According to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), over 800,000 workers in Alaska, Oregon, and Washington, D.C., will be directly impacted by these changes, alongside numerous cities and counties that will raise their minimum pay rates. Currently, the federal minimum wage remains unchanged at $7.25 per hour, a rate that has stood still since 2009.

As living costs have gradually increased, several states and municipalities have opted to raise their minimum wages through legislation and ballot measures. EPI’s state economic analyst, Sebastian Martinez Hickey, noted that these increases aim to better support workers and their families. Full-time workers in Alaska could see an average annual pay increase of about $925, while those in Oregon might experience an increase of approximately $420.

Women make up about 58% of those benefiting from these wage hikes, with Black and Hispanic workers also likely to gain significantly, highlighting ongoing disparities in wage growth. Although the federal minimum wage has not changed in 16 years, there have been ongoing discussions, such as legislation proposed by Senator Josh Hawley to raise it to $15 per hour. Specific minimum wage increases include Alaska’s new rate of $13.00 an hour, raised by $1.09 due to a voter-approved ballot measure.

In Washington, D.C., the new minimum will be $17.95 an hour, reflecting a 45-cent increase. Meanwhile, Oregon’s minimum wage will rise to $15.05 an hour, following a 35-cent adjustment. Additional wage increases will occur in 12 cities and counties across California, Illinois, and Maryland, with various adjustments that range from 40 to 54 cents per hour.

Beyoncé Overcomes Frightening Car Malfunction at “Cowboy Carter” Concert in Houston

Beyoncé faced a potentially dangerous situation during her first concert of the “Cowboy Carter” tour in Houston on Saturday night. While performing her song “16 Carriages,” she was suspended in a red convertible when it began to tilt unexpectedly. Fan-captured videos from the event show the singer, who is 43 years old, calmly reacting to the alarming scenario. As she was elevated in the air, the vehicle began to slant, prompting Beyoncé to say into the microphone, “Stop.

Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop.”

Thankfully, she appeared to be secure in a harness and held onto one of the cables, ensuring her safety. The music was halted, and the car was gradually lowered back to the stage without incident, allowing the performance to continue. The precise cause of the car’s malfunction remained unclear following the event. Despite the scare, Beyoncé later shared her love for Houston through an Instagram post, including a heartfelt caption that read, “I love you, Houston,” along with a collection of images from the concert.

This Houston performance is part of her “Cowboy Carter” tour, which follows her successful international leg where she showcased her talent across six nights in London and three nights in Paris. The incident serves as a testament to her professionalism and ability to handle unexpected challenges during her performances.

Sen. Mark Warner Claims Trump’s Tax Bill Will Become a “Political Albatross” for Republicans

Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, expressed concerns over President Trump’s tax bill, stating it could become a “political albatross” for Republicans. He highlighted the bill’s potential cuts to social safety nets and significant projections for the national debt, suggesting many Republicans are uneasy about their support. “I think many of my Republican friends know they’re walking the plank on this,” Warner said during his appearance on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.”

The Senate is currently rushing to pass the controversial legislation, often referred to as the “big, beautiful bill,” in time for a July 4 deadline. The House had narrowly approved the bill the previous month, which aims to extend the tax cuts initiated in 2017 under Trump, while also funding border security and energy production. However, these efforts come with trade-offs, including cuts to healthcare and nutrition programs.

The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill could increase the deficit by approximately $3.3 trillion over the next decade. In addition to the increase in national debt, Warner criticized the bill for its adverse effects on rural hospitals, health insurance access, food assistance, and clean energy job prospects. The Senate is entering an extensive overnight session as they work toward finalizing the legislation, which will require approval from the House before heading to the president.

Senate Republicans are utilizing the budget reconciliation process to advance the bill without bipartisan support, a move that leaves Senate Democrats with limited options other than delaying the vote. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s strategy to read the entire bill delayed discussions significantly. When addressing concerns about bipartisan opposition to the bill, including some provisions beneficial to Democrats, Warner remarked, “You can put as much lipstick on this pig as you want.”

Warner also noted that the legislation could lose Republican support, stressing that the outcome was still uncertain. Meanwhile, House Republicans are feeling pressure to support the bill, fearing repercussions from both President Trump and their constituents. GOP Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas indicated he would back the measure due to its funding for border security and tax cuts, asserting that even those skeptical of the bill might ultimately support it.